Reactions to 1-Star Reviews of Books I Love

A few months ago, I watched a video on the YouTube channel Mercys Bookish Musings in which Mercedes read 1-star reviews of books that she loves. I found the idea so interesting that I decided to also have a look for negative reviews of some of my favourite books on Goodreads and write my reactions to a number of them.

I chose five books from different genres and selected a review for each one of them that pinpoints the reasons why the person basically hated it. I’ll now quickly explain why I respectfully disagree with such opinions. It’s normal to have dissimilar views on books, so it’s not my purpose to be offensive towards other readers.


Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier

Rebecca was the first book that I read by Daphne du Maurier and remains my favourite after having read other three (Jamaica Inn, The King’s General and My Cousin Rachel). I was aware that not everyone is a fan of this novel, but I didn’t think I was going to find so strong negative views, such as the one below.

What can I say? The characters are one of the reasons why I love this novel. Their common story is so absorbing that, as soon as I finished reading, I missed being in their company. I also can’t remember a major plot line that doesn’t get a resolution. The narrator, Mrs de Winter, is extremely insecure, true, but she becomes much surer of herself by the end.


The Miniaturist by Jessie Burton

I debated for a while whether to choose The Miniaturist or The Muse for the purpose of this post. I settled on Jessie Burton’s debut novel, because I believe that it is a more divisive one. In fact, I was already aware of many of the criticisms that I encountered while choosing a 1-star review.

I’ll just be addressing a few of the points made in this review, seeing that some fall into the category of personal preferences, and I can’t argue about that. Not understanding the reason why the book is titled The Miniaturist is a recurring criticism made about it. In my opinion, the title is related to the characters being almost like miniatures of what they could have been if they hadn’t lived in a society that oppresses them and prevents them to lead their lives as they would have liked. Thus, the miniaturist is not only a person but the seventeenth-century Dutch society as a whole.

I disagree that it doesn’t focus on the story it is telling and that the characters lack depth. They are more complex than they seem at first. I became quite attached to them, even though some are not particularly likeable. Also, the last thing I would say about it is that it’s uneventful. It may be a slow-read at the beginning (which I didn’t mind), but it soon becomes a page-turner.


A Game of Thrones by George R.R. Martin

I thought that A Game of Thrones was a book either loved or liked by everyone who enjoys fantasy. I was wrong!

It’s really difficult to address the points made in this review without spoiling the book. I’ll try, though. Predictable events? They were only predictable to me because I had watched the first three seasons of Game of Thrones before I started reading the books, and I loved it anyway. But I don’t think what happens at the end is that common in fantasy. I would also never call the characters one dimensional. Not even Ned Stark is wholly honourable. He lies to protect the ones he loves. The characters have different layers to them, which is one of the reasons why so many people love this book.


Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen

Pride and Prejudice is not only my favourite book by Jane Austen, but also one of my favourite classics. I’m bound to disagree on everything a person who doesn’t like it thinks.

I would never describe Austen’s style as pretentious. She doesn’t shy away from being witty, though, and I love that. I don’t think the characters are one dimensional either. They learn from their mistakes, realise that they have misjudged people and change their ways. The misunderstandings between Elizabeth and Mr Darcy are used to criticise the importance given to social status.


The Year of the Death of Ricardo Reis by José Saramago

I was expecting the majority of the 1-star reviews to damn the writing style. There were a couple of those, but I found this one much more interesting.

This reviewer has a point when she says that being aware of its “meta-ness” enriches the reading experience. This book is considered to be one the best ever written by Saramago in Portugal but isn’t as well-known worldwide for a reason. From my point of view, it’s fantastic, but I also like Fernando Pessoa and enjoy reading about the period it is set in.


What’s your opinion on these books? Do you love or hate them? Tell me in the comments!


7 thoughts on “Reactions to 1-Star Reviews of Books I Love

  1. Captain's Quarters says:

    I absolutely adored this post matey! It helps that I have read 4 of the 5. Me review for the miniaturist was that it was just okay. I liked the writing, loved the setting, and thought the book’s beginning was fantastic. However the mystery resolution was odd and I thought the Marin subplots were weird. Not that I really remember who Marin is anymore.

    I also have never heard of José Saramago before. But that 1 star review intrigues me! I will have to check out that author’s work. Arrr!
    x The Captain

    Liked by 1 person

    • Susana_S_F says:

      Thank you! 😊
      Saramago was the only Portuguese to win the Noble Prize in Literature. He wrote literary fiction sometimes mixed with magical realism elements. If you want to try his work, I would recommend starting with either Death at Intervals or Blindness!

      Liked by 1 person

      • Captain's Quarters says:

        Well I looked at the blurb for blindness first and it sounds awesome. Plus the local library has it in ebook format. So I shall start there. Thanks for the recommendations matey! I will let ye know what I think when I (eventually) get to it. Arrr!
        x The Captain

        Liked by 1 person

  2. MarinaSofia says:

    Of the ones I have read, I certainly agree with you about Rebecca and Pride and Prejudice, two of my favourite books too. I wasn’t as blown away by The Miniaturist as most people, but certainly thought it was much better than that 1 star review implied – and I like your interpretation of the title. I also thought that maybe it refers to the main characters wanting to construct their own little world, yet failing ultimately to keep it safe and free of the social influences and prejudices around them.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Guinevere says:

    Pride & Prejudice is one of my favourite books too, so I probably am a bit biased. I understand why you can be no fan of the writing style or the genre she writes, or even think that her characters are “stiff”. But I believe that in seeing Jane Austen’s books exclusively as romance, this person misses the point entirely.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.